8) are structured databases containing issues and resolutions and have been compiled within a project and help to share knowledge related to resolutions and prevent issues from occurring

Answer:

Once there was an old man. He had four sons. They always quarreled with one another. One fine day he decided to teach them a lesson. He called all his room. As they came and sat in his room. He said to them, "Today I am going to teach you a very important lesson of life. Pay heed to it. There is a bundle of sticks lying in the corner, and I want each one of you to try to break it."

All the four sons tried to break it one by one. But no one of them could do it. After all the sons had tried their best and given up, he asked his eldest son, "Now, open the bundle and separate the sticks and try to break them. " Quite easily, each of the four sons broke the sticks easily.

The old man said. "Did you see when the stick were bound together, nobody could break them; however, when they were separated, each stick could be easily broken. Similarly, if you remain united like the bundle, no one will be able to break you. But if you fight and live separately, you will be easily broken."

The sons understood the lesson. They decided never to fight with one another. They had learnt that unity is strength.

A cogent argument: i see that animals adapt to their environments, therefore animals must have DNA that allows them to adapt, and thus adaptation must be based on genetics.

Not cogent: i see animals adapt to their environment, therefore ots a fact that all animals evolved from a single cell organism that came to life magically one day.

Cogent arguments are based in empirical evidence, are are based on logic, reason, sense. A cogent argument must be sequitur and testable.

hope it's helpful for you...

pls Mark me as brainliest answer..

A powerful inductive argument in which all of the premises are true is known as a cogent argument. Uncogent arguments are inductive arguments that are either weak or have at least one erroneous premise.

Explanation:

• Deductive arguments have qualities such as validity and soundness. Inductive arguments cannot be legitimate since the truth of their conclusions is not required by their premises.
• As a result, a new term for evaluating inductive arguments is required.
• The veracity of the premise makes the conclusion more likely to be true than untrue in a convincing argument.
• Example:
• The majority of birds have the ability to fly.
• Tweety is a bird, after all.
• As a result, Tweety is likely to be able to fly.
• Not convincing: I witness animals adapting to their surroundings, hence it's a truth that all animals developed from a single cell organism that miraculously sprang to existence one day.

Answer:

0.46 lol or if you meant / 0.6 then its 1.36

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

the answer is 0.46.

PLEASE MARK ME AS BRAINLIEST

[tex]\underline{\textbf{Given:}}[/tex]

[tex]\mathsf{1.\overline{729}}[/tex]

[tex]\underline{\textbf{To find:}}[/tex]

[tex]\mathsf{\dfrac{p}{q}\;form\;of\;1.\overline{729}}[/tex]

[tex]\underline{\textbf{Solution:}}[/tex]

[tex]\mathsf{1.\overline{729}}\;\textsf{is a non-terminating recurring decimal number}[/tex]

[tex]\textsf{We can find its}\;\mathsf{\dfrac{p}{q}\;form\;as\;follows:}[/tex]

[tex]\mathsf{Let\;x=1.729\,729\,729\;.\;.\;.\;.\;.}--------(1)[/tex]

[tex]\textsf{Multiply bothsies by 1000, we get}[/tex]

[tex]\mathsf{1000\,x=1729.729\,729\,729\;.\;.\;.\;.\;.}--------(2)[/tex]

[tex]\textsf{Subtract (1) from (2), we get}[/tex]

[tex]\mathsf{1000\,x-x=1728}[/tex]

[tex]\mathsf{999\,x=1728}[/tex]

[tex]\implies\mathsf{x=\dfrac{1728}{999}}[/tex]

[tex]\implies\boxed{\mathsf{1.\overline{729}=\dfrac{1728}{999}}}[/tex]

#SPJ3