6. Shared offered to general public for contribution are called? (a) Authorized shares (b) Called up shares (c) Issued shares (d) Subscribed shares​

Answer:

Let’s convert this statement into a mathematical equation. Let the number of remaining chocolates be x. You have given two chocolates to each student. Therefore, the number of chocolates distributed is 2 × 40 = 80.

Number of remaining chocolates = Number of total chocolates − Number of distributed chocolates.

⇒ x = 87 − 80 or, x = 7.

Converting Equation into Statement

Consider an equation, 3x − 5 = 17. The possible statement for this equation is 5 taken away from thrice of a number gives 17.

Solving an Equation

Solving an equation means to find the solution of the given equation. A simple equation has an equal (=) sign. This equality shows the balance of both the sides of the equation. The equation remains the same when the expressions are interchanged. There are some methods to solve simple equations.

Trial and Error Method

Substituting different values of the variable and checking the equality of LHS and RHS is the trial and error method. Let us solve the equation 3x + 5 = 17. We start to substitute different values of x. The value for which both the sides are balanced is the required solution.

x LHS = 3x + 5 RHS = 17

1 3x + 5 = 3×1 + 5 = 8 17

2 3x + 5 = 3×2 + 5 =11 17

3 3x + 5 = 3×3 + 5 = 14 17

4 3x + 5 = 3×4 + 5 = 17 17

For x = 4, LHS = RHS. The required solution is x = 4.

2x=15+3

2x=18

x=18/2

x=9

I hope it will help you

Explanation:

KayThe history of Anthropoidea is the history of primatology in amicrocosm. Anthropoidea, Order Primates, Semiorder Haplorhini,Suborder, Anthropoidea is a particularly useful lens through whichto focus on the history of primatology because from its roots in pre-evolutionary classifications, through its polyphyletic status underSimpsonian systematics, to its current conception as a monophyletic group,Anthropoidea has persisted as a “natural” group with relatively stable content.This essay examines how this common content has been imbued with differentmeanings by changing conceptions of classification and explanation in biology.In addition, just as studies of anthropoid phylogeny provide insight into extantanthropoids themselves, this essay aims to provide insight into the roots of cur-rent ideas about anthropoid origins. Thus, this brief survey provides historicalbackground, placing the work of our colleagues in historical perspective, andexamines the foundations of what we believe about anthropoid evolution today.ESSENTIALISMAnthropoidea was recognized as a natural group at the birth of modernclassification. Linnaeus (Caroli a Linné) (1707–1778) classified Simia (monkeys3Callum F. Ross ● Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook NY 11794-8081Richard F. Kay ● Biological Anthropology and Anatomy, Duke University, Durham NC 27710Anthro-01.qxd 12/12/03 8:51 PM Page 3

and apes) as one of four divisions of his first mammalian order Primates(animals with four parallel upper incisors and two pectoral mammae), the othersbeing Homo (humans and orangutans), Lemur (lemurs, lorises, and flyinglemurs), and Vespertilio (bats). Simia were primates with four incisors in eachjaw, approximating one another in the midline; long foliate (or spear-shaped)canines separated from the incisors by a diastema; and blunt molars (Linnaeus,1766, p. 54). They consisted of 35 species (e.g., pithecia, rosalia, oedipus,jacchus, midas, apella, capucina from South America), each of which wasaccompanied by a description of the characters distinguishing it from otherspecies and by notes on its location.As an essentialist, Linnaeus believed that what was natural about this classi-fication were the unchanging, ideal essences of the genera (see Greene, 1959).The essences and categories existed the way they did because that was how Godhad created them. Consequently, no materialistic explanations were required,either for the existence of the essences, or for the categories they defined.In capturing and defining God’s order, the very act of classifying constitutedexplanation enough.RATIONALISME. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire’s and George Cuvier’s classifications of animals,including Primates, attempted to ground classification on a rational founda-tion. Like Linnaeus, they believed that God had created animals, so a materi-alistic explanation for the existence of the categories was not necessary.However, they assumed that God used rational principles in creating animalsand that the way to uncover God’s plan was to apply rational principles to clas-sification (Appel, 1987).Geoffroy and Cuvier’s (1795) collaborative classification of mammals wasbased on the rational principle of “subordination of characters,” under which thesubordination of categories in the classification was determined by the subordi-nation of functions in organisms. The primary taxonomic divisions were based onthose functions deemed to be most important in an animal’s life, while second-ary divisions were based on subordinate functions. Applying this principle, theirfirst division of the Class Mammalia was based on the anatomy of the organs ofgeneration and circulation, the second division on the anatomy of the tegumentof the digits, the organs of tactile sense, and the third on the teeth, the organs ofnutrition (Geoffroy and Cuvier, 1795). Accordingly, Quadrumanes, or Primates,Callum F. Ross and Richard F. Kay4Anthro-01.qxd 12/12/03 8:51 PM Page 4

were defined as mammals because they gave birth to live young and nourishedthem with breasts, as members of the third embranchement because they hadnails or claws (rather than flippers like marine mammals, or hooves like ungu-lates); and members of an unnamed group possessing three kinds of teeth.Quadrumanes were differentiated from all other mammals by possession of anopposable pollex and hallux. Within Quadrumanes, the genus Singes (anthro-poids) was defined as those animals with four incisors in each jaw which were notprocumbent and elongated as in lemurs and lorises (Geoffroy and Cuvier, 1795)..

Answer:

don't know this answer because it is from your book

Explanation:

1. Vinod came to Bhopal for an official visit and after returning to his home he decided to travel by train.
2. He changed his plan to go to the second class as the train was overcrowded.
3. He decided to go in AC class where he found the young man.
4. The appearance of the young man surprised him because he is not wearing a clean dress, having a worn suitcase with him and so he(Vinod) thought that the young man had no job.
5. All the other passengers are well dressed and look rich, that's why he was surprised to see that man.

Answer:

hope it helps. refer to the attachment below.

Explanation:

mark as brainlist.

Here are some compound words with pictures charts listed below: